The phrase implies a rejection of negotiation or compromise as a viable solution, suggesting a preference for more assertive or even aggressive strategies. Online, particularly on the specified platform, this sentiment often arises in discussions where users perceive a conflict or problem as intractable through conventional means. For example, in a debate about online harassment, the phrase might indicate a user’s belief that reporting and moderation are insufficient, advocating instead for direct confrontation or counter-measures.
The prevalence of this attitude highlights a growing frustration with traditional methods of conflict resolution and a desire for more immediate and impactful action. It can stem from experiences where diplomatic approaches have failed to yield satisfactory results, leading individuals to believe that only decisive, unwavering stances can effect change. Historically, this perspective mirrors situations where nations, faced with perceived existential threats or intransigent adversaries, have abandoned diplomatic efforts in favor of military action or other forms of coercion.
